664a45a97d394

664a45a97d912
1 Guest is here.
 

Topic: SCP Beta 4 Issue Reporting
Page: « 1 ... 39 [40] 41 »
Read 46264 times  

664a45a97e14dvoodoo47

664a45a97e1b4
obviously. my point was that there is no meaning in trying to make the perk viable on that difficulty, as it's just not going to happen.

so lets accept this is a hard/impossible difficulty deal and make sure it's one the player would have a reason to take.

664a45a97e33cZylonBane

664a45a97e38e
Apparently I need to explain more.

When a player "SUCKS AT THE GAME" that means, among other things, that they get DAMAGED A LOT. Players who get damaged a lot really like having MORE HIT POINTS. The more the better. There is no such thing as too many hit points. There are people who suck at this game so much that they seek out the undead cheat code, giving themselves essentially INFINITE hit points.

"No more hit points please, I have enough" is incomprehensible Moon language to people who play on Easy.

664a45a97e47avoodoo47

664a45a97e4c7
hmm, hard to argue if you put it that way. not sure whether we care about people who are beyond any help though. probably not?

either way, if the change results in a nerf on the hard and impossible difficulty, then I would view it as not desirable. you want to give more than 10 bonus hp to the hopeless people playing on easy? sure, as long as it doesn't mean those playing on impossible will suddenly get only 2.
« Last Edit: 04. December 2023, 17:05:47 by voodoo47 »

664a45a97e59fZylonBane

664a45a97e5ee
Where are you getting 2 from? The maximum HP on Impossible without Tank is 25. 25 * 20% is 5.

Well, players do like their instant gratification, so as suggested upthread, something like granting an immediate +5 to HP, then a +20% permanent modifier could work. That would end up giving Impossible players about the same HP boost as they're getting currently.

664a45a97e6c7voodoo47

664a45a97e712
then sure, why not.

//2hp was calculated from the starting hp pool on impossible (not taking extra endurance as a career choice), which is 10, so 10*0.2=2. calculating it from the maxed out pool would indeed make it 5, which isn't nothing, but would still be a 50% nerf compared to b4. I don't think I would like that.
« Last Edit: 04. December 2023, 20:24:25 by voodoo47 »

664a45a97e86cZylonBane

664a45a97e8b7
Alternatively, Tank could give a % HP bonus based purely on the starting HP, before the Endurance bonus is applied. That way players would get the full effect of the upgrade immediately. I'm not saying I'd be a fan of this, I'm just listing it as a possibility.

Let's see... the base HP values, from Easy to Impossible, are 45, 30, 24, 7. The HP gain per END values are 10, 5, 3, 3. Since you always start with one point in END, that makes the lowest starting values actually 55, 35, 27, 10, and the highest values with max END 105, 60, 42, 25. Okay, this is getting to be a lot of numbers, so I'll just consider Easy and Impossible from this point.

Adding +20% to the current computed value would get you to 66 ... 12 before any upgrades, and 126 ... 30 with max END. For going all-in on maxing HP, this seems fair.

Tacking a base +5 to that would make the max 132 ... 36. Hmm, that ends up almost quadrupling the starting Impossible HP.

Another possibility would be to just give a flat bonus equivalent to 2 points of END. So base +20 on Easy, +6 on Impossible. This would yield max values of 125 ... 31, which is surprisingly close to the +20% values.

664a45a97ea48Nameless Voice

664a45a97ea9d
Isn't a percentage bonus very much falling into the "but it's more effective the later you take it" issue, which we had with the +1 PSI stat buff for Power Psi.

I think it's better if the trait is already effective when you only have 1-2 END.  You're so tight on modules on Impossible that you might not be able to afford more points in END until later in the game.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

664a45a97edd2ZylonBane

664a45a97ee25
Isn't a percentage bonus very much falling into the "but it's more effective the later you take it" issue
No, because all these proposed formulas would be added every time stats are recalced, based on the current stats. This is possible because HP is a derived stat. Psionics is a "core" stat, so the only robust way to bump it (without rewriting every psi script) is to straight up give the player a Psionics point.

664a45a97f2f8ThiefsieFool

664a45a97f34a
Psionics is a "core" stat, so the only robust way to bump it (without rewriting every psi script) is to straight up give the player a Psionics point.

That is not the only way. I just showed you a robust way to buff Psi with a trait, by raising the strength of psionic projectiles (their damage, stun, etc) proportionally and based on the player's current Psi stat.

In fact this was already implemented in NVScript so no extra scripting needs to be done. I forgot that the script can already handle traits, and since you didn't look you didn't notice it either.

Code: [Select]
int iTraitNum = ParamGetInt(m_iObjId, "NVStatBasedProjectileTrait", -1);

if (iTraitNum != -1) {
if (pShockGame->HasTrait(oFirer, iTraitNum)) {
float fTraitScale = ParamGetFloat(m_iObjId, "NVStatBasedProjectileTraitScale", 0.10f);
fValue *= (1.0f + fTraitScale);
}
}

pPropSrv->Set(m_iObjId, "arSrcScale", NULL,  fValue);

664a45a97f40dZylonBane

664a45a97f457
In this case by "robust" I mean, "boosts the psi stat for ALL systems that use it". Projectiles are only a tiny subset of the available psi powers. If the OS upgrade were called "Psishooter" that would be fine, but "Power Psi" implies a more general-purpose boost.

664a45a97f6aasarge945

664a45a97f6f8
@RoSoDude how were you able to increase the PSI stat by 1 for all powers (including duration based ones) in RSD when overloading?

Might make sense for SCP to also scale duration based powers, since currently overloading does absolutely nothing for the vast majority of psi powers, which seems extremely strange.

664a45a97f79aZylonBane

664a45a97f7e3
RSD did like what I've been saying-- he reimplemented all the psi scripts in Squirrel. Around 800 lines of code.

664a45a97f889sarge945

664a45a97f8d8
If you're not willing to reimplement the scripts (which is fair enough), it seems mostly pointless to try and do anything with psi overloading at all since the majority of disciplines won't be affected.
664a45a97fa84
While playing the game yesterday, I had a brawn boost implant deactivate (as if its power was depleted) before it was down to zero percent.
This happened shortly after I upraded the maintenance skill (with the implant active while doing that).

664a45a97fb41voodoo47

664a45a97fb8b
so you got the "power drained" bark, and dropped items because the inventory shrunk by 3 tiles, despite the implant still having a bit of charge or something?

either way, if you cannot replicate and/or share the saves, then there isn't much we can do.
« Last Edit: 06. December 2023, 13:59:49 by voodoo47 »
664a45a97fc71
Yes, that's what happened.
I do have a save file and I'm trying to reproduce the issue. I'll get back to you.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

664a45a97fe9cZylonBane

664a45a97feec
it seems mostly pointless to try and do anything with psi overloading at all since the majority of disciplines won't be affected.
Yes, which is why we've mostly been discussing Power Psi, not psi overloading.
664a45a9800ec
I do have a save file and I'm trying to reproduce the issue. I'll get back to you.

Well, I can't reproduce it now.
What I did at the time was upgrade the maintenance skill two levels (from 4 to 6) with the brawnboost implant active. The power ran out at ~45%. Not really a problem, just odd.

664a45a980178ZylonBane

664a45a9801c1
Aha!

Wait... no... cannot reproduce.
« Last Edit: 06. December 2023, 21:56:01 by ZylonBane »

664a45a9802e8ZylonBane

664a45a980339
I noticed that the Thief games label quicksaves as:
(Quick Save)
Whereas in SS2 it's just:
Quick Save
I kind of like the parens around it, helps visually set them off from the manual saves. Any objections to adding them to SS2's quicksave and autosave names?

Digging into this, I'd completely forgotten that in vanilla SS2 both quicksaves and autosaves are labeled "Auto-save".
Acknowledged by: Salk

664a45a9803c4voodoo47

664a45a98040d
can't say I care much for this.
Acknowledged by: Marvin

664a45a9804b5ZylonBane

664a45a980500
Which sounds better?

A) "Increases maximum hit points by amount equivalent to 2 points of endurance."
B) "Increases maximum hit points by equivalent of two points of endurance."

664a45a980598sarge945

664a45a9805e2
A, hands down.

B isn't even a grammatically correct sentence (it should be "the equivalent of").
1 Guest is here.
In Gothra village, the girls’ sit-in finally notched a small victory.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
664a45a9807af