6645261e0851f

Post Reply

Warning - While you were reading 6 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
Your name:
Subject:
Message Icon:

Verification:
This box must be left blank:

In which year was System Shock 2 released:

Shortcuts: Alt+s to submit/post; Alt+p to preview


Topic Summary

Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 08. May 2024, 19:58:19 »

so I've watched a (new) FO4 playthrough for a bit;

-yes, all the annoyances are still there, Bethesda don't care
-people who just do not save are not exclusive to the SS2 environment
-the ability to continuously ignore all attempts of the game to teach the player how to work the mechanics is not rare

not getting into that anytime soon.
Posted by: icemann
« on: 04. May 2024, 05:02:39 »

Fallout 4 is a mixed bag. The combat is great, the world is quite large and there's heaps of content. On the other hand a lot of the RPG stuff was removed such as:
* Actual choices in conversations
* Stats and skills giving additional conversation options
* Skill System
* Ability to play how you want, and be the type of character that you want to be. Good, neutral or bad.

For a far superior Fallout experience I'd recommend New Vegas preferably with the 3 fan made expansions + Tale of Two Wastelands mod to combine the game with Fallout 3. Far better experience of the wasteland.
Plus lots more.
Posted by: fox
« on: 03. May 2024, 14:40:52 »

I don't remember FO4 being too buggy but of course it's a Bethesda game, so only relatively speaking. Most complaints I have heared were about it being too streamlined into shooter territory which is partially true but I still had lots of fun exploring it. To be honest, I might have enjoyed the action-oriented aspects of the gameplay more than with FO3 or NV because of it and I also enjoyed the less depressing, technically updated, look. The main story was weak as usual for the Bethesda FOs and compared to New Vegas but that came expected and is not really a problem for me, as there's enough good side stuff and environmental environmental storytelling to keep me interested.

I stayed away from Fallout 76 because people made fun of its buggy state (and the lack of NPCs) for quite a while but when I tried it a year or two ago, it seemed ok (relatively speaking again).

I ended up enjoying the first season of the new show too. The first two or three episodes are mostly for establishing the setting. They competently captured and recreated the tone of the Bethesda-FOs to a degree that positively surprised me although some of the characters and/or their actors really rubbed me the wrong way (like Maximus). Walton Goggins, on the other hand, is excellent. Once the story starts to unfold after those initial episodes, things start to get interesting on a less superficial (pun not intended) level, too. I'm happy to know that another season is in the works. Potentially the first show/movie based on a game franchise that I can really enjoy (although I have yet to watch The Last Of Us).

I'm not sure how appealing the Fallout-world really is to the broader mainstream audience but I guess the red scare / nuclear holocaust themes are striking a nerve these days. Maybe that specific combination with retro-scifi, fantasy and dark humor does too. The timing could be just right for this.
Posted by: Nameless Voice
« on: 03. May 2024, 14:04:18 »

I seriously doubt they've fixed the painfully awful writing.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 03. May 2024, 11:48:29 »

..and Fallout, Fallout everywhere. well, better than infected hooves, I suppose.

was thinking maybe I should give FO4 another whirl, but then remembered how I just got fed up with all the bugs and missing/broken mechanics, and all the mods that fixed the bugs and mechanics, only to introduce new bugs, so you would have to get more mods to fix those, and so on..

so I think I'm good - but I guess no harm in asking, did Bethesda fix anything in the last decade?
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 18. March 2024, 23:21:28 »

..facebook today - here is all the AI generated porn that exists.
porn isn't good
I shouldn't have said that, I should not have said that..
Posted by: Nameless Voice
« on: 08. March 2024, 02:00:43 »

Wasn't that always the case?

I'm reminded of this old Monty Python song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8ANSnM-vRE
Posted by: icemann
« on: 08. March 2024, 01:51:21 »

... wait, are people seriously complaining that music is bad now because it's less acceptable to randomly hate on gay people?  That's a pretty weird criteria for sure.

I wasn't meaning that that made the music bad or good. More just was stating of how more sanitised what is played on the radio has become nowadays.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 07. March 2024, 18:28:51 »

Wow you are old.
yes. sometimes it feels like I'm knocking on heaven's door.

no need to apologize - not limited to AC/DC of course, that was just an example showing where approximately the bracket lies. also, game soundtracks.
Posted by: Join2
« on: 07. March 2024, 17:43:10 »

I wouldn't know, I think I'm good with finishing this ride listening to AC/DC.

Wow you are old.

I am not much a fan of hard rock I guess. I like rock and metal/heavy metal, but hard rock rarely sounds exceptional me. Good yes, but wow I could listen on repeat, no. AC/DC are ok. KiSS suck. Ozzy Osborne meh. Guns & Roses meh. Motorhead is quite badass though.

Sorry bro. Still, I'll take it over modern crap anyday and they made GREAT backing tracks to many classic american action movies.
Posted by: Nameless Voice
« on: 07. March 2024, 16:43:14 »

It'd odd, I hadn't even really noticed it - shops used to play music, but now they rarely do.  Can't think of any shops I've been in recently where I've heard music, other than the inescapable Christmas music around December.

I'm not a heavy shop person, the main shops I'd be going to be would be supermarkets to buy groceries, and they don't play music.
But also other shops I've been in don't generally play music, or if they do, it's very quiet.

Might be because you need a licence to play music in a public premises here, and I remember that was costly for a small business back in the day.

Pubs tend to have music (usually much too loud), but it's generally older stuff or traditional, rather than anything modern / popular.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 07. March 2024, 16:32:53 »

I wouldn't know, I think I'm good with finishing this ride listening to AC/DC.
Posted by: Join2
« on: 07. March 2024, 16:00:48 »

Lol how are you guys avoiding the radio? Never leave the basement? I am partialy joking but to me that seems like the only way to avoid it!

Retail stores? Radio. Someone else's car? Radio. Work? Depends on the establishment. Luckily, not for me. But I still can't escape the damn cursed airwaves.
Gym they play not the radio, but their own playlists which often contain pop music from a few years back, mumble rap, other worthless crap like super generic dance.

... wait, are people seriously complaining that music is bad now because it's less acceptable to randomly hate on gay people?  That's a pretty weird criteria for sure.

Who...said that?

Edit: oh icemann. Yeah I don't really want anti LGBT stuff on the radio. Don't want pro stuff either though. Dont want immodest sexual shit, period. If there exists pro, then I advocate for anti too. So there.
Posted by: Nameless Voice
« on: 07. March 2024, 15:56:21 »

I kind of want to steal this emoji     hackery.

Do people actually still listen to the radio?  I thought everyone just used music streaming services these days?


... wait, are people seriously complaining that music is bad now because it's less acceptable to randomly hate on gay people?  That's a pretty weird criteria for sure.
Posted by: Join2
« on: 07. March 2024, 15:54:31 »

Epilepsy warning for the video also.

Ear violation warning too. That's some excessive reverb on the vocals.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 07. March 2024, 15:42:42 »

Code: [Select]
[emoji=Wilted Flower][youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOPoysfnE68[/youtube][/emoji]
Posted by: icemann
« on: 07. March 2024, 15:37:50 »

Something funky is going on with that video link. Not seen a video without even being clicked on, pulse like that on the forums here before. Epilepsy warning for the video also.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 07. March 2024, 15:37:35 »

ok, wrapping a youtube vid with the emoji code is freaky.
Posted by: tiphares4
« on: 07. March 2024, 15:34:48 »

Posted by: icemann
« on: 07. March 2024, 15:33:40 »

I agree somewhat with the above, though not the fellatio bit. Definitely far less instruments, more woke and less allowances of non-left aligned stuff in the lyrics (eg no anti-LGB of the like that Eminem often did, and even earlier on Guns'n Roses did as well). I definitely agree on there being less innuendo or modest sexiness (eg Madonna's 90's stuff) and far more direct just going full or very close to full nudity (eg Cardi B or Megan Thee Stalion, whose music is pretty much porn and you find actual porn versions on pornhub of some of their songs).
 
Though this is all "mainstream" radio, and not all music. If you delve into the more underground radio stations then you'll find FAR more variety. Progressive rock for example and metal are still going strong, just not on mainstream radio.

As for older artists, some are still at it. It just never makes it onto the radio for some odd reason. If you look to Spotify or similar then you'll often find new albums etc from the older bands and singers.
Posted by: Join2
« on: 07. March 2024, 14:44:04 »

In almost every music video I watch there are the same few comment types on top. There is "Still vibing to that song in 2021!" and "They don't make them like that anymore." and finally "This used to be my father's favourite song. Reminds me of long car rides we shared. I miss him so much."

The first is a transparent attention grab, it happens for any year as long as the video gets enough views. The second is the only one of the 3 that's probably genuine, because it's such a common misconception that the music of your youth was the best, whether that was 50 years ago or 5. It is only the last of these that I wasn't sure about. I kept finding this type again and again though, always highly rated.

It absolutely IS a common misconception. Ask anyone, their favorite is from ages 0-25 or so. Makes perfect sense. That was when everything was fresh, they had their first crush, their first concert, whatever.
But now, the misconception ends. Mainstream music is now heavily degenerate, talentless, FAR less diverse, lack of instruments involved = less skill honing, practice, feedback and innovation among a group. And speaking of groups (a composer, songwriter, and singer in this example), they're disjointed. Don't even work in the same room. Don't even need to know how to read music. They even did a study proving modern mainstream music was more repetitive and stupid on the whole (comparing word count, vocabulary and such).

The artists these days are often hired not for their musical talent also, but for alternate concerns. Their ability to give fellatio, lack of principles (readily "sell their soul" to do whatever the record label asks), because they're a looker and that sells tickets to teenage girls...because they will dress as a devil, talk about sex in clear English (old music almost always used innuendo instead so they were not understood by the young),  spread degeneracy and corrupt the youth and the easily influenced (women more so than men, matter of factly).

Think of how many older artists there were back in the day, even on the radio. Where are old artists on the radio now? NON EXISTENT.  They're old and ugly, and have old-fashioned principles. They are relegated to doing tours and small time venues. There was tons of ugly artists in general too. Again, pretty much phased out now outside of rare exceptions. It's not about the music anymore.

I could go into far more detail, but I should start charging.
Posted by: icemann
« on: 07. March 2024, 02:58:58 »

It is a thread about ranting or blabbing about the random stuff that interests you.
Posted by: fox
« on: 06. March 2024, 17:46:04 »

Random stuff. Pretty self-explanatory: random stuff that you'd like to share but you don't feel like it merits a dedicated thread.
Posted by: Xkilljoy98
« on: 06. March 2024, 17:29:11 »

I see this thread get replied to sometimes and I don't even know what it is about
Posted by: icemann
« on: 25. February 2024, 07:43:29 »

Definitely would be IMO.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 24. February 2024, 21:07:27 »

..so I've caved in and let the phone be signed into a gmail account permanently. not the main one of course, just the backup account I use for file storage only
getting a fair amount of "make me an editor" requests for files where it makes no sense for anyone to have full permissions (the Rebirthed cutscene, for example). ignoring them completely of course, but is this some kind of attack attempt, I wonder.
Posted by: icemann
« on: 11. February 2024, 07:16:05 »

For sure. Personally just being able to watch Youtube on my tv is quite handy.

Only way I was able to do that prior was hooking up the old PS3, which came with a Youtube app.
Posted by: sarge945
« on: 11. February 2024, 00:03:40 »

Our tv is the first "smart tv" that we've owned. Had to sign in to Google account for Google Home. Quite good having access to all the apps and Youtube. Gave me a reason to actially turn the tv on beyond watching the news each day.

Now just wait for the ads to start showing up on your dashboard after a "critical security update".

I like the premise of smart TVs, being able to watch content from various internet sources easily. The problem is that everything with "Smart" in the name will eventually be used against you.

At my old place, I had a PC hooked up to my TV and did most things that way, so that I could use adblocker and such. But I get the appeal of the simplicity of just buying a TV, plugging it in, and having it all ready to go. Just be careful and make sure to always have a contingency plan for when the inevitable happens.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 10. February 2024, 09:21:47 »

I don't have a tv. if I need stupid and annoying the internet can provide just fine.
Posted by: icemann
« on: 10. February 2024, 07:16:22 »

Our tv is the first "smart tv" that we've owned. Had to sign in to Google account for Google Home. Quite good having access to all the apps and Youtube. Gave me a reason to actially turn the tv on beyond watching the news each day.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 07. February 2024, 17:32:42 »

..old man's (mis)adventures with smartphones, continued - so I've caved in and let the phone be signed into a gmail account permanently. not the main one of course, just the backup account I use for file storage only. so now each time a moron finds an outdated link to a 10-year old TFix build and requests access, the phone beeps. I'm ecstatic.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 21. January 2024, 22:06:22 »

I harbor no affection for hooves of any type. I even find marshmallows unfit for consumption.

but pasta is a good deal, though I have to admit I may be too liberal with its preparation methods sometimes - good thing there are no Italians around, they possibly would want to stab me.

avert thine eyes Italian friends, cheap noodle is getting rinsed with cold water now.
Posted by: fox
« on: 21. January 2024, 22:00:19 »

People who like infected cow hooves also like burnt spaghetti. Common knowledge.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 21. January 2024, 19:54:51 »

..so I'm outside, explaining that burning a pasta dish slightly is a perfectly valid way of food preparation used by Italians to a relative, thinking of spaghetti all'assassina.

I return home, facebook goes here is a spaghetti all'assassina recipe.


IT KNOWS YOUR THOUGHTS
Posted by: fox
« on: 20. January 2024, 11:05:56 »

Whistling

I really hope this is getting interrupted by multiple ads for dramatic effect.
Posted by: sarge945
« on: 20. January 2024, 02:03:14 »

Most youtube videos have been nothing but ads for a while now.

I used to watch a lot of game review/criticism type channels, but I found most of them started making more and more long-winded videos that weren't really saying anything, because if you go above 23 minutes you get put into a higher ad-revenue bracket.

So video after video was just word salad very slowly getting to a point that could have been reached in 20 seconds.

These new ads are just the ones you're noticing. The reality is that Youtube has been nothing but an ad platform for over a decade, with small nuggets of good content occasionally.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 19. January 2024, 22:42:33 »

so I'm getting ad videos in my youtube feed now, about every 6th video, buy this car, date this chick, get a job as a delivery guy, try this toenail fungus medicine.

I think I want the infected cow hooves back.
Posted by: fox
« on: 05. January 2024, 11:51:34 »

Blue Scuti Beats NES Tetris
"With rolling players theoretically playing forever or as long as the game can handle, this video features CTWC 2023 semi-finalist 13 year old Blue Scuti doing something that has never been done before. He LITERALLY BREAKS AND DEFEATS THE GAME!"
Posted by: fox
« on: 18. December 2023, 18:22:10 »

Posted by: Jules
« on: 15. December 2023, 03:41:50 »

John Romero has recently released SIGIL II for the original Doom. I'm pretty sure a lot of people here have already heard of the original SIGIL's release some years ago, and for that matter have probably heard of SIGIL II's release as well. I'm hardly the biggest WAD player out there but I couldn't miss any of Romero's recent work for Doom and I have to say I've not been disappointed at all - it's a satisfyingly tough 9-level long episode (it's really hard on Ultra-Violence) that also feels fresh visually in spite of using few custom resources. As far as vanilla experiences go, it's great stuff.

Oh, by the way: the WAD is not compatible with conservative source ports such as Crispy Doom, but it's relatively easy to patch it to work on the latter - I can share the patched WAD if anyone is interested.
Posted by: icemann
« on: 09. December 2023, 04:07:16 »

Well I can't speak for everyone else, but the main gameplay loop I quite liked. It's the added extras in later games + removal of good features that lowered it for me. Plus the music was excellent (VC and SA in particular) in the earlier games.

GTA 4 - Removed the RPG elements + customization (clothes, tattoo's and haircuts) added in GTA SA as well as purchasable properties and territory control, went for a more realistic approach, getting harassed by your brother to go bowling every 2 minutes was very annoying. Music sucked in this game compared to past entries with no memorable radio stations. Positives was the in-game internet, strip clubs and television shows.

GTA 5 - RPG elements partially back and purchaseable properties. Being able to switch characters on the fly was interesting though it made the game feel a bit disjointed. Great graphics. Too focussed on heist missions and needed more of the core gameplay loop of past games. Music again was average with nothing memorable present.
Posted by: sarge945
« on: 07. December 2023, 23:50:56 »

For me, the best GTA's were around the GTA 3 to GTA: San Andreas era. Everything since has been a disappointment. Even GTA 5 (which was far superior to 4) was far too focused on the heist missions, which I found quite boring.

People say this like it's some kind of truism but GTA has had the same core fundamental gameplay since GTA 3.

I think people are slowly realising that the core gameplay is bad and only like the old ones due to nostalgia from when they were younger.

The games have never been good. The core issues have been there since the beginning.

It reminds me of the people who like Call of Duty 4 but not "the modern ones". They are the same game, people need to stop deluding themselves.

I'd imagine this is because they don't want any one segment to be larger than 4GB, because that's the limit of old FAT32 filesystems.

You could say no one would be using those any more, but this is Good Old Games, so it's not unreasonable to assume some of their users might be using ancient machines running Windows 98 or similar.  Plus, USB drives are often formatted FAT32.

They should at least offer the larger option, which is exactly what Steam backups do.

Also, USB drives nowadays should be using exFAT, which doesn't have the 4GB limit.
Posted by: fox
« on: 07. December 2023, 17:16:41 »

For me, the best GTA's were around the GTA 3 to GTA: San Andreas era. Everything since has been a disappointment. Even GTA 5 (which was far superior to 4) was far too focused on the heist missions, which I found quite boring.
I didn't like GTA 4 and its more serious and "realistic" approach much either, also the vehicle handling was terrible. Definitely my least favourite of the bunch.

In my personal ranking it's probably followed by GTA 3, which certainly was an impressive transition from the previous 2D/top down-era but otherwise not that memorable to me.

Vice City and San Andreas on the other hand were both really great in their own ways.

I enjoyed GTA V a lot and it felt like a state of the art-update of many elements that made the franchise successfull. It did however lack a little bit of the colorful flavour of SA and VC that came with being set in very specific eras and subcultures. V felt (even) less focused and too current in some ways.

Red Dead Redemption 1 and 2 trump them all.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 07. December 2023, 15:50:59 »

with every bullet so far? trust me, he was exactly what his mods were;
Quote by System
Plastic Trash
Posted by: Marvin
« on: 07. December 2023, 15:03:33 »

I don't know for sure anymore (brain trying to delete the info as a defensive mechanism, probably), I think darkfate.ru had (or was linking) that stuff? google browser translate was enough to navigate it even back then, so I'm guessing there will be even less problem now.

or download one of the nooka-nooka mods of the modder that shall not be named from here, get the ucoz site link from the readme, and go straight to the viagra ad hell.


//ok maybe don't, we don't want to boost those download counts. pic attached.
:stroke:

I miss the guy.
Posted by: voodoo47
« on: 07. December 2023, 14:43:43 »

I don't know for sure anymore (brain trying to delete the info as a defensive mechanism, probably), I think darkfate.ru had (or was linking) that stuff? google browser translate was enough to navigate it even back then, so I'm guessing there will be even less problem now.

or download one of the nooka-nooka mods of the modder that shall not be named from here, get the ucoz site link from the readme, and go straight to the viagra ad hell.


//ok maybe don't, we don't want to boost those download counts. pic attached.
[I_warned_ya.PNG expired]
Posted by: Nameless Voice
« on: 07. December 2023, 14:41:49 »

As a result, many games (especially larger games) will have 30 manual installer parts, because they don't want to increase the size of their installer part files (for some reason), and they are often out of date as Voodoo said.

I'd imagine this is because they don't want any one segment to be larger than 4GB, because that's the limit of old FAT32 filesystems.

You could say no one would be using those any more, but this is Good Old Games, so it's not unreasonable to assume some of their users might be using ancient machines running Windows 98 or similar.  Plus, USB drives are often formatted FAT32.
Posted by: Marvin
« on: 07. December 2023, 14:35:04 »

Ok, I need a link to quell my morbid curiosity. PM if it's too embarrassing, or too dangerous.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
6645261e08ff5