686eeb2ea7b35

686eeb2eab286
1 Guest is here.
 

686eeb2eabb11voodoo47

686eeb2eabb7d
Note - this is now included in SCP, do not use unless you know what are doing.


so as we all know, Rickenbacker lacks proper maps, probably because of the time constraints. and it would be really nice to have them created - if available, we could implement them in SCP.

-must fit the general SS2 map aesthetics.
-must be reasonably accurate.
« Last Edit: 02. January 2024, 11:47:18 by voodoo47 »

686eeb2eabe9cunn_atropos

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eabf08
I would modestly suggest my Blueprints of the U.N.N. Rickenbacker for this.

686eeb2eac02dZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eac07a
I stand by my opinion that automapping rick1 in any sort of useful way is basically impossible. It's sliced into so many layers that to fit every layer into the map window they would all have to be ridiculously small. Rick2 and rick3 are the opposite-- they're so tiny that you don't even need a map.

686eeb2eac11avoodoo47

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eac165
I'm quite sure that something could be done. somewhat accurate maps are still better than no-maps.

no such thing as perfection in this world.

686eeb2eac1f7ZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eac244
The horror...
Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eac3be
What about a sideview map?

686eeb2eac463ZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eac4ae
1. Not technically possible (the player position marker is hardwired for X/Y coordinates)
2. Would be pretty much useless even if it could be done
Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eac5f5
Im pretty convinced that a map for Rickenbacker would actually make the player more confused than benefit for anything. As ZB is saying all the layers is the cause of this

686eeb2eac692voodoo47

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eac6dd
we don't know unless we try. and it's not like we are getting spammed by tons of user made Rick maps anytime soon.

686eeb2eac94eZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eac9a2
Im pretty convinced that a map for Rickenbacker would actually make the player more confused than benefit for anything. As ZB is saying all the layers is the cause of this
Uh, no. What I'm saying is that rick1 has so many layers, and each layer is so large, that it's physically impossible to fit them on the map screen at a useful size. It's a really, really, big map. Probably the biggest in the game. When you view it in DromEd it looks like a freaking Borg cube.

Even if there was a way to fit everything in at a useful size, it would then require manually setting the map IDs on hundreds of room brushes. A huge amount of effort for barely any benefit to the player since most of rick1 is linear.

686eeb2eacd1aGrosnus

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eacd6e
This is my best attempt at making this happen:









Deck A is basically a giant cluster of insets, but instead of showing that in a standard way, I decided to seperate map into layers and only show specific "sub-insets" for each layer.
Something similar was done here: https://www.systemshock.org/index.php?topic=2049

A few areas accessible by ladder are intentionally skipped which is not uncommon in vanilla maps anyway. I was even thinking about merging Nacelle B tunnels into one area intead of 3 - in current form it might be even more confusing with automap than without. Besides, I feel there's way too many numbers in the map already.
I tried to keep the style as close as possible to original, so I had to stick to several "rules" of layouting, which only made it more difficult to fit everything in. In the end the scale isn't that bad - Rec2 map has even smaller elements than this.

All rooms and markers are set in .mis files, so everything should work fine. I had to split a lot of room brushes into smaller boxes to match map segments. It's based on SCP maps, so SCP will be required to try it out.
I don't think new automaps are going to work in saves, so new game is also required, at least from my experience.

Overall it works much better during gameplay - even though Rickenbacker is very linear, uncovering new areas gives a nice sense of exploration - something I always liked in games with maps like this.
[Rickenbacker_automaps.zip expired]
« Last Edit: 15. February 2018, 19:14:32 by Grosnus »
Acknowledged by 5 members: JML, unn_atropos, hemebond, edx, RoSoDude

686eeb2eace1dZylonBane

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eace68
Holy cow.

686eeb2eacf19voodoo47

Re: New resource request - Rickenbacker maps
686eeb2eacf62
what he said. based on beta4 maps, I would assume? //yes. also, if you are using SHTUP, the intrface folder from the archive needs to be copied there as well.

saves from before entering Rick for the first time should be fine.
« Last Edit: 15. February 2018, 07:53:44 by voodoo47 »
686eeb2ead1c3
I guess Christmas is coming early to the SSorg community this year, what with the logo update and now this.

686eeb2ead267voodoo47

686eeb2ead2b1
yeah - pretty sure we'll want to release the next version of SCP sooner than Halloween this year.
Acknowledged by: JML

686eeb2ead4c4Grosnus

686eeb2ead7a1
also, if you are using SHTUP, the intrface folder from the archive needs to be copied there as well.

What do you mean exactly, copied to where? Is there some sort of compatibility issue?
Also, I just noticed there's typo in rick2 map, I'll fix it later today.

686eeb2eadc0cvoodoo47

686eeb2eadc69
yeah, because I've added the files directly to SCP, so SHTUP overrode (woah, that's an actual word) the new maps. should be ok as long as you use the maps as a standalone mod. anyway, it's nothing you would need to be concerned about, we will merge the files properly for the upcoming SCP/SHTUP release(es).
686eeb2eae019
yeah - pretty sure we'll want to release the next version of SCP sooner than Halloween this year.
Don't let certain people hear that :o

And yeah, nice job on the map!

686eeb2eae0c6Grosnus

686eeb2eae115
Ok, the typo in rick2 is fixed now.
I updated the attachment in my first post.
Acknowledged by: voodoo47

686eeb2eae1cdunn_atropos

686eeb2eae218
Did you use my blueprints as a base? If so, my hours of useless work were not in vain after all  XD.

Indeed a awesome time to be a System Shock fan, with all the new shiny stuff coming out!

686eeb2eae320Grosnus

686eeb2eae36a
Your blueprints helped me get a sense of scale, especially for rick1. Thanks to that I was able to nail the scale in first try, otherwise if I made a mistake it would be very painful to redo everything  ;).

In the end I had to retrace all walls directly from missions, because there were some differences in the map vs the actual area where player can walk, e.g. the area around missile control room.
That was the fun part though, the worst was to divide room brushes into smaller chunks without introducing room errors  :carnage:.


686eeb2eae64c
Grosnus, that looks great (at least to my inexpert eyes). When you think about it, considering how small the SS2 fan-community is, we're incredibly lucky to have so many talented members prepared to give their time and effort to improve the game.
 

yeah - pretty sure we'll want to release the next version of SCP sooner than Halloween this year.

Or you could release a maintenance release (SSP beta 4.1?) any time you liked, instead of waiting until you feel enough of a milestone has been released to afford the jump to beta 5.
Acknowledged by 2 members: JML, icemann

686eeb2eae6eealuminumhaste

686eeb2eae738
Holy crap that looks amazing!
I've downloaded the resource, but ummm, where do I stick it to get it working?
1 Guest is here.
Certainly it constitutes bad news when the people who agree with you are buggier than batshit.
Contact SMF 2.0.19 | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines | Terms and Policies
FEEP
686eeb2eaf56e